Acts20.com

How would you like it if when rumors of one woman don't succeed, they just create another one? It worked on Herman Cain and Roy Moore. Yet the church falls for it

No need for me to defend him. This was LOOOONg ago and I read F. Graham's statement and agree with it. I can state my case but I cannot help him. I believe he is a victim of a smear campaign and the woman is risking MUCH to push the issue, unless she had a stellar childhood and did no mischievous stuff.There is a problem with coming forward to praise or criticize because the press is all over ANYONE and their lives are a MESS until the case goes away.Most folks are not public speakers and the average person cannot afford an attorney to be with them and run interference with the press. With out interference most people will make an 'English blunder, or just say something that can be taken several ways.I think I would get irratated with mikes thrust in my face ever time I left my house. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

Even if it did happen like Ford claims it did (which I seriously doubt, based on the fact that none of the people she cites as witnesses corroborate her story), I honestly don’t think it should matter at all what he might have done when he was 17 and purportedly falling-down drunk. His record since then has no spots whatsoever. Dozens of women he has known and worked with since then have all attested to his being a gentleman. It is not clear at all why this alleged incident should matter the least bit.

Re: I'm Just Happy That...

Truly sad. You hit the nail on the head

Are you saying you would not be supporting him even if there had not been these allegations, based on the fact that you don't know him

aw come on Eddie, it seems unlikely one has never supported someone they did not know personally. I supported Jimmy Carter, Adlai Stevenson, Jeb Bush, Perot and old Reagan and certainly did not know them.I would have liked to, because their public records seemed good and intact. But in the long run it matters not what the truth is on old Kav, this did not help his image.............. anyway... Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

I don't have any idea if Kav did or didn't do something inappropriate as a teenager.But in this country he should be presumed not guilty in the eyes of the law - and what should be more about the eyes of the law than a person on the Supreme court. If ladies got molested - that is very sad - and I get why they never came forward...but so far everyone they have mentioned were also at the party can not corroborate their story. How do we hold someone accountable for something no one else can verify.There is no DNA.There are no pictures.There is no corroborating testimony.By both ladies testimony - they were seriously drunk - did they even know what was going on and with whom?It could have happened - but on any level of fairness - there simply is no case to be made.Every last person on Acts might have molested someone. It could have happened. But without any other verification from anyone else - why should I believe it is so?This is another high tech lynching from the news media. The parents of these young girls - especially the 15 year old - where were they? Who threw this party for kids - that's who needs to go to the slammer

It didn't matter because he was 17 is a REALLY bad take, in my opinion. He's accused of holding his hand over a 15 year-old's mouth and attempting to assault her, which ended only because she escaped. As I understand the allegation, he is not accused of stopping like a gentleman when she said no, like Franklin Graham said. The only way it wouldn't matter would be if Kavanaugh owned it, said it was a long time ago, that he regretted it, that his behavior since then was completely different, etc.But Kavanaugh's not saying that. He's completely denying it, and as I understand it denying that he even knows Ford.

In the 1980's, our church received a new pastor who was formally licensed with the AOG. He was a good man, and I personally liked him. He resigned about nine months into the pastorate due to health issues, and family matters. I was later to discover that while in the Assemblies, a young girl had accused him of sexual misconduct. Those allegations were taken seriously, as they should have been. After an investigation, and a trial board, at the last minute, the girl confessed it was completely fabricated, and her mother put her up to it. Apparently, the mother was disgruntled over something, and this was her way to get even. I wasn't given anymore details on the matter. Although that pastor was ultimately exonerated, it was something he never fully recovered from. I'd say he tried to move forward by joining another denomination, and leaving town. But, the damage was done.As some posters have already commented, we don't know the validity of the accusations surrounding the Supreme Court nominee. However, based on what we DO know, i.e. his overall track record with women, and the flimsy evidence presented (if you can call it that) thus far–– it appears to be a political hit job to keep this man off the court at all cost