Acts20.com

….but you need to open your eyes.

Coulter correctly points out the racism of the left, then follows it with an article that is seething with racism and white supremacy.

In the history of the world, there has never been a more pacific, less rapey creature than the white male of Western European descent.That's crystal clear white supremacy. She's saying that white males are more peaceful and less rapey than other races; by necessity she is saying that people of color are more violent and rape people more often.

That is not supremacy. That's like saying it's black supremacy by saying blacks overall are better at basketball than whites. She is not citing any inherent trait in men of any race that makes them more or less prone to rape. Rather, she is pushing back against the insinuation of the left that WHITE men ARE more prone to rape and thus have no right to comment. Stats and history do indeed refute the accusation made by the left against white men

She's literally saying that white people are less violent and rape less. That is the exact same thing as saying people of color are more violent and rape more. If A > B, then B < A.

Again, what do you call the accusations that white men ARE more prone to violence and rape? Do you have a name for that? It is the above attack on white men that Coulter is reacting to. And if history or stats show the exact opposite of the accusations being made against white men, how is that white supremacy? In Europe, for example, rape is rampant and very few are committed by white men. Now Dave, either that is a statement of fact or it is not. How am I a white supremacists by simply stating a fact

There really isn't a commonplace opposite of white supremacy if that's what you're asking. I'd probably just call it racism.

There really isn't a commonplace opposite of white supremacy if that's what you're asking. I'd probably just call it racism.

Not so. If white men and men of color are equally unrapey, then her statement could be true