| Acts20.com https://www.acts20.com/ |
|
| Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 https://www.acts20.com/viewtopic.php?t=87870 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Nature Boy Florida: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| Roy Moore is just another Hillary Clinton.The only way their party loses is if Roy/Hillary runs |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dave Dorsey: |
| Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | UncleJD: |
| Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Resident Skeptic: |
| This just goes to show how naïve you are. It would not have mattered if Strange had been the nominee and it won't matter who the nominee is in 2 years. Women will be coming out of the woodwork. Moore lost because Shelby and McConnell want Trump impeached and his agenda defeated. Shelby was behind the write-in candidate |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | chestnut ridge: Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| This just goes to show how naïve you are. It would not have mattered if Strange had been the nominee and it won't matter who the nominee is in 2 years. Women will be coming out of the woodwork. Moore lost because Shelby and McConnell want Trump impeached and his agenda defeated. Shelby was behind the write-in candidate. Moore lost because his campaign was awful. Moore lost because he under performed. He lost because he is not the legend he thinks he is........ in his last statewide election he under performed. Shelby was not behind a write in candidate. |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | chestnut ridge: Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dave Dorsey: |
| Roy Moore didn't stand up to liberal government overreach, he stood up to the Constitution. But that doesn't even really matter. In the Senate, Roy Moore and Luther Strange would have voted the same way 999 out of 1,000 times. Alabamans got hoodwinked by Bannon and the alt-right, who continually use whatever influence they have to highlight and promote anti-establishment candidates. They worked very hard to paint Strange as a McConnell ally and clone, it worked, and last night was the fruit of that. |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dave Dorsey: Re: Luther Strange defeats Doug Jones in AL special election, 62-37 |
| You're kind of being a jerk, FYI. I realize you're upset about the result, but your responses since the election last night have been unnecessarily personal.Please remember that this is a Christian forum and that it is expected that posters will treat each other with kindness and respect, even when there are intense disagreements. |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | UncleJD: |
| Dave,Can you please show us in the Constitution where putting the 10 commandments in a courthouse is against the law?It doesn't matter anymore I guess. I would agree that Strange would have been the better candidate, Trump certainly thought so as well (though he'll get no credit for that I'm sure). |
| Author: | acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Dave Dorsey: |
| Sure. Glassroth v. Moore was based on a violation of the Establishment Clause, though I suspect you might write that off in that case (not without reason) given that the prohibition of the Establishment Clause is on Congress, rather than the Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court. I would suggest the Sixth Amendment is a more proximate response for originalists, specifically its guarantee of an impartial jury of the State or district where a crime was committed. Moore installed the monument in the middle of the night without having consulted or received the consent of his fellow justices. That's not okay. He's not a martyr for his Pyhrric, self-serving refusal to remove it. Rulings against the monument were unanimous at every level, yet Moore placed himself above the law. |
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-04:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | |