Based on what I have heard from my family, I'm probably 3/16ths Native American of three different tribes, I'm told, with Cherokee on both sides of the family. But a blood test could not get me membership in the Cherokee Tribes. There is a list from the early 1900's that was drawn up of tribe members, and you have to show descent from one of these members of the tribe. My ancestors must have assimilated in the 1800's and missed being carried away out west to Oklahoma on the Trail of Tears.A lot of people in the southeast are part Native American, but have no legal standing when it comes to being a member of a tribe.Warren may have shown this to argue against those who consider a fraud. The amount in her blood and the lack of legal status as a Native American may not be enough to keep her critics from considering her a fraud, but it may be enough to gain favor in the eyes of liberal voters in Massachusetts. Maybe she hoped releasing the information would cause the contraversy to die down.1/64th may seem like a lot of Indian to people up in the Northeast. Maybe they are less mixed with Indian up there.I know about my own heritage just based on what my parents and other relatives in the family have told me. My great grandmother on one side was either half or full Cherokee. I have certain other tribes on my dad's side of the famil. Maybe a lot of Americans are told about their Indian ancestors. I've ticked Native American and White on some forms, unless it specifies that you have to be a member of a tribe. If I were in politics, would I get in trouble for ticking those Native American boxes