Acts20.com

NOT responsible for topics auto-embedded from Archive.org [use a proxy] Absolutely NO unmasking!

How Romans 1 Rebukes Those Who Excuse Sexual Harassment and Abuse (L)

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Author Message
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey: How Romans 1 Rebukes Those Who Excuse Sexual Harassment and Abuse (L)
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
reformedmargins.com/romans-1-rebukes-excuse-sexual-harassment-sexual-abuse/


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I agree with that view. I've never been as thankful to be in Maryland as I was last year -- I was able to vote my conscience without having to give any thought to a bigger picture.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Cojak:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
YOu would think according to Marcos that President Trump and Moore were out there now abusing and degrading women.No I do not excuse any degrading of women. But I am logical enough to know that if many had not voted for Trump, you would have a much more Liberal Supreme court. Folks I was not voting for a General Overseer or a pastor. There were TWO logical candidates for President. Since I was voting for a Government Leader, I voted for Trump. Do I like him? I still do not know. He is a mouthy jerk at times. Just like the stupid 'man talk' recorded.I hope things ar changing. BUT for now you still have people in charge who use/used their position to get sex or rule over or demean the female.BUT to repeat a very worn statement, I prefer a person who is less admiral than I like, to Hillary Clinton who was the only other real electable choice. Oh yes I understand 'voting your conscience' fine. But for me voting or writing in a person who would not make it, did not set with me. SO I did vote Trump. At times I would not care if he resigned, but make all the great lectures you want. WE still had two choices in Logical reality TRump/Clinton. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Nature Boy Florida: Re: How Romans 1 Rebukes Those Who Excuse Sexual Harassment and Abuse (L)
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
reformedmargins.com/romans-1-rebukes-excuse-sexual-harassment-sexual-abuse/Read the whole thing. I never have excused abuse.Hillary Clinton covered it up and attacked women who were abused.My Christian values said: No way she could be allowed to be President. I will vote for the better candidate next time as well


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: bonnie knox:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I don't think it's been that long ago that Trump was degrading a particular female reporter who dared to challenge him on his record with women.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Again, both this and the statement NBF made are understandable positions. The article is talking more about the many, many evangelicals who are enthusiastically endorsing, supporting, and defending Trump on social media, in their churches, in their communities, etc.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Nature Boy Florida:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Again, both this and the statement NBF made are understandable positions. The article is talking more about the many, many evangelicals who are enthusiastically endorsing, supporting, and defending Trump on social media, in their churches, in their communities, etc.I think one could reject Trump and still vote for him as the slightly lesser of two profound evils, but that does not seem to be the general view of Trump among evangelicals. Maybe TV evangelicals are huge supporters.I am around a lot of church people and most voted for Trump.None of them are happy with him - he makes us cringe.But we had no real choice


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: wayne: I'm with Cojak!
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Preach brutha!!! My wife pointed something out this morning about President Trump....he is not and never was a politician. He has a past that does not meet up to the standards of your standard politician but he does have a past of running a business. He might be a one term president but I'd bet he gets more done in 4 years that Obama did in 8. In fact, he has already upset both the Democrat and Republican party and have you looked at our financial numbers? His White House staff is quite a bit smaller than the previous administrations, he is donating his paycheck to help the country, other countries are now viewing us differently...


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey: Re: I'm with Cojak!
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I think this is kinda more along the lines of what the article was talking about.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic: Re: I'm with Cojak!
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I think this is kinda more along the lines of what the article was talking about.Sure, he does think it's OK to grab women by the [ahem], but did you see those financial numbers? Also, I don't condone sexual assault, but Democrats, am I right? No, I do not think that is what is being said here at all. Nor do I feel voting for Trump means I condone his sin. Really, I think the author of the article should start a movement to keep Christians from partaking in the political process at all, or to start running Christian candidates with a clean past. I hear a bunch of whining, but I do not see a grass-roots effort on the part of the Evangelical community to send our own people to State Houses or to the Federal Congress. Really, the latter is more of a shame than the former. We could truly dominate politics if we wanted to


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Return to “Acts 2.0”
Jump to: