Acts20.com

(TeaParty.org) – The Left must be crying in their beer today as they watch the mud they flung at Judge Roy Moore cleaned and polished off of him. The original accusation posted by the fake news site WaPo included allegations of improper contact with four women when they were teens. Somehow, WaPo failed to say that three of the women did not accuse Moore of any sexual improprieties and were perfectly legal. The lone one that did has seen her accusations completely debunked.Leigh Corfman was the first accuser to contend any illegal contact occurred but her story has more holes than Alpine lace Swiss cheese. First, she said that she would talk to Moore on the phone in her bedroom so that her mother wouldn’t hear, but that was a lie because her mother said she did not have a phone in her bedroom. She also claimed that she met Moore right around the corner from her house, but the address she gave is a mile away and would require her to cross in the middle of a busy highway. Corfman also claimed that her experience with Moore made her take drugs and become loose. That was proven to be a lie because the day she claimed she met Moore, she was in court because her mother wanted to give custody to her father on account of her bad behavior. Just eleven days later, she went to live with her dad in another town, making her timeline of events nearly impossible. And in the year following her claims against Moore, her behavior got much better, and it’s documented in court papers.From Breitbart

I love the logic here! Her mother said she did not have a phone in the bedroom, but I also heard that her Mom said the cord from the phone would have reached to the bedroom. (Our landline phone is at least 30 years old, and we've always used a very long cord with it.) I have not heard anything about her Mom denying the story.(I think I'm going to dismiss Corfman's account, though, because I'm pretty sure a 14-year-old couldn't walk a mile and cross a busy highway. LOL)

This is simply not an accurate statement about the original WaPo article that I read that was linked here on Acts. It DID say that 2 of the young women had not said he did anything beyond kissing and that at the time, they did not feel anything inappropriate was done. One of the three women besides Corfman claimed he did buy an alcoholic beverage for her when she might have been underaged. So yes, I've seen headlines that group three women in the category accusers, but what is posted in the OP does not correctly characterize the original WaPo story. When Corfman relates how the alleged encounter affected her emotions and subsequent behavior, that is not a connection one can prove or disprove. And the very biased article in the OP attempts to do that by presumptions based on a couple of reports that can't possibly know as much as Corfman's behavior as she knew herself. It tries to link loose sexual behavior to the bad behavior that supposedly was occurring when her parents were going to court over custody, but by her testimony, her sexual behavior to that point had only included kissing boys. Also, I have to laugh at the naïve assumption this opinion piece writer makes that a teen cannot hide bad behavior.As far as Nelson, it is entirely possible that Moore signed the order to drop her divorce suit without Nelson actually being there. So, unless you can prove she was actually before him physically, you can't prove that she lied when she said she never saw him again.Of course, if you are concerned with statements like, I never saw him again, you probably will wonder what Moore meant when he claims not to have known any of his accusers. (Again, this woman is not accusing Moore of inappropriate conduct at the time, only that they dated and kissed. The headline is annoying that way, but I don't know what one-word substitution would work to keep the headline short.)hotair.com/archives/2017/12/04/roy-moore-accuser-just-found-note-moore-wrote-17/ Thus my inclusion of a question mark in the title. As for the most recent note, what does it prove? It it written like a teacher or professional would write to a young person. It certainly does not prove a relationship of any kind was going on. Having worked in high schools since 2005, I've signed lots of yearbooks. Yet, I did not have a relationship with any of the young girls whose yearbooks I signed

Did you ever include a title that didn't belong to you at the time?

yearbook inscription admitted forgery, credibility gone

www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/08/roy-moore-accuser-admits-forged-part-yearbook-inscription-attributed-to-alabama-senate-candidate.html

Well debunked or not it is pretty obvious this started as a simple Political plan to ruin a man's chances of being elected. One who had a pretty good reputation for many years.The fallout is amazing, it seems democrats and republicans right and left are falling from the fall out.I honestly like old Newt. I think he is one of the real brains in the Republican party. I also agree with his assessment of a 'lynching party' in the media and the wild fire around many folk. IN MOST cases so far, it is only accusations and in most cases no testimony or cross exam of accusers. I know I have no right to, but I am smiling to see some democrats and republicans catching some flack. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

The inscription is not a forgery. The inscription is Roy Moore's inscription and the notes at the bottom are Nelson's. I wrote this three weeks ago:

I tend to believe that where there's smoke there's fire. But in our current atmosphere today of women coming forward to make claims against (usually powerful) men, and with their statements often being believed almost

Aaron, have you noticed that even with the people who admit they are guilty, sometimes the accusations don't come till many years later? That is very typical.