He transcends gender divisions. We know that. And yet, God CHOSE to call Himself a FATHER. Why? I think it was at least two-fold: 1) To distinguish from the many goddess religions of that time and place; and 2) because He functions more in the stereotypical father sense (I think) than in the stereotypical mother sense.However, since we agree that God is neither male nor female in the traditional sense of the word, we still see that God is represented as a FATHER...and as a SON. But that clearly begs the question of, If there is a Father, and if there is a Son, then is there a Mother?I don't consider the Holy Ghost to be feminine in any particular way (certainly no more so than the Father or Son), but if MAY BE that, in keeping with the familial assignments of Father and Son, there could be someone who, while neither male nor female, functions in some sense as the Mother element to the Father and Son.Possible?