Acts20.com

NOT responsible for topics auto-embedded from Archive.org [use a proxy] Absolutely NO unmasking!

Bylaw change proposal

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Author Message
acts
Post subject: Judah4Him: Bylaw change proposal
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I have heard rumors of a proposed bylaw change that will be attempted as a motion at this assembly for each state to elect their state overseer instead of appointment by the EC. Could be interesting.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Quiet Wyatt: Re: Bylaw change proposal
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Re: Bylaw change proposal


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Tom Sterbens:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
It is not on the current agenda approved by the Executive Council.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Clint Wills: Re: Bylaw change proposal
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
It is not on the current agenda approved by the Executive Council.And I don't think any such measure could be presented at the assembly to the motions committee because I'm pretty sure it would require prior notification.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: MrSippi: Re: Bylaw change proposal
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
It is not on the current agenda approved by the Executive Council.And I don't think any such measure could be presented at the assembly to the motions committee because I'm pretty sure it would require prior notification. Any chance that the body could waive the prior notification claus if a motion is a REALLY good idea? lol


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Quiet Wyatt:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Didn’t they have a situation several years back (I’m thinking it was in the early 2000s) when they finished the whole agenda and somebody made a motion to reduce the TOT immediately from 15


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Quiet Wyatt:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
You are correct. If the agenda is completed, the motion committee can present motions from the floor. That has happened many times over the last several years. However, a change to bylaws requires previous notice and a motion to change a bylaw is not permissible without proper previous notice.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: 4thgeneration: Previous notification
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Just wondering... does Actscelerate count as previous notice?


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Cojak:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I took 'Parliamentary Law' once under L.B Thomas in the 1950s. It was not Roberts Rules of Order and I cannot remember what the procedure was called, but it was used in General Assemblies for years before Robert's. Some parliamentary procedure was used once to get a motion on the floor without using the normal roads. I want to think it was in an open service in the evening and the chairman was forced to open a business session. It had to be in the early 60's Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Return to “Acts 2.0”
Jump to: