Acts20.com

Re: question about GA voting

If you try that, please get video. I would love to see the stampede to stop you from sitting on the GC floor More of Him...less of me.twitter.com/camiracle77www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name

If you try that, please get video. I would love to see the stampede to stop you from sitting on the GC floor! A stampede that would leave bodies on the floor.The idea of instituting a mixed media format that offers video, audio & instant voting technology from the GC floor at the GA is one that has passed from trusting leadership to trusting the membership.Might have a chance in 10+ years.

If you try that, please get video. I would love to see the stampede to stop you from sitting on the GC floor! A stampede that would leave bodies on the floor.The idea of instituting a mixed media format that offers video, audio & instant voting technology from the GC floor at the GA is one that has passed from trusting leadership to trusting the membership.Might have a chance in 10+ years.

Someone on FB mentioned they would have to vet that the technology worked correctly and that no one could hack in that wasn't supposed to be able to...something to that effect More of Him...less of me.twitter.com/camiracle77www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name

If you try that, please get video. I would love to see the stampede to stop you from sitting on the GC floor! A stampede that would leave bodies on the floor.The idea of instituting a mixed media format that offers video, audio & instant voting technology from the GC floor at the GA is one that has passed from trusting leadership to trusting the membership.Might have a chance in 10+ years.

I think QW is spot on here. But for the argument of illegal voting, I am a believer that our nation's voting, no matter how strict, still has 'illegal or wrong' voting. That said, I do not think it is enough to sway an election. i.e. most illegal voting comes from states that illegals would vote the way the state would go anyway. So the fear in the COG (If it is) that the sneak vote may happen, and it would , but probably not go against a dedicated majority. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

A compromise might work. The COGOP mails/emails out the business documents three months before the assembly to the local churches. The local church can (some don't) distribute the documents to the members for review. An local church Expression Form is voted on (something like Yes, No, Submit, Abstain) on each item. By mail or email the expression forms are returned to the International Offices (including local church number, Pastor's and Treasurer's Name). This is don't globally.The forms are tallied and the results are presented during the business session of the assembly. However, they are not binding, but informative. Since the COGOP does not uses a bicameral system, the vote on the assembly floor is the binding vote. Sometimes, due to input some of the items are amended/changed/dropped before they are presented to the assembly.As a note, the COGOP vote includes both ministers and members in good standing, men and women alike.