Acts20.com

In a separate post, a dear poster communicated several innuendos that I think are confusing and perhaps even hurtful for some. My greatness weakness is speaking my heart. I probably should refrain from seeming reactionary or responding to this post. Perhaps the ignorance and untrue suggestions of the post provoked me to post a number of things I have had in my heart anyway. Whatever the case, this post presumes a great hypothetical circumstance that would never be an issue. It seems super-hypothetical primarily because as much as I loved/love the COG, I do not know if I would ever hold credentials with her again. It is even more hypothetical because I understand the nature of the COG. When a person leaves they are the black sheep forever. And I totally understand why. I am not addressing these issues because I have an ambition to want your vote one day. You took a hypothetical post and leveled 5 accusations that in a veiled way behind a veiled identitiy caused good people to get caught up in dishonest narratives. His points are bolded followed by my response.

see... told ya

This is why I would vote for Bishop Wallace if he came back and if I could vote. Clear, articulate, and with kindness, he addressed personal attacks.Thank you Kev- for your gracious response.

Kevin,This is yet another example of gutless sniping. As I've said a THOUSAND times...my favorite verse of scripture is:

I’ve got this one Mods and Kev

New Urban guy- Any attempt to out a poster or those identity can result in a temporary or permanent ban.

I appreciate you guys following this but just for clarity sake- New Urbans post was a response to a thread and not my original post or within the framework of my thread. I want to be clear that I was hypothetically discussing kev’s second Cool Ming and listed good reasons why someone should vote for Kev (is that what we call him now? Sounds hip and trendy so I’m in) Thanks

Re: From Kev

started to go through these point by point, but there is no use. you and Sterbens love to attack pen names when its convenient. I'll ask you to humor me with one final question. Is your real Name the only one you have ever or currently use on acts? Years ago I used one, Theonomous.The guy who owns Peanut Butter gave me the login a hundred years ago (No, I am not the owner or originator of the name). I used that one for a half dozen or so hyper-satirical posts. And then there is my Apostle Tom screen name.Oh yeah...and there was Loimos (really like that one - the bug - I should see if it is still active).I think that about covers it. You?And I don't attack pen names when it is convenient, I do it to specifically attack gutlessness whenever it shows up.

Thanks Kevin. You didn't owe anyone anything, but I appreciate you being open about your ministry. I still expect your greatest days of ministry are ahead. NBF, and my real alter ego, are big fans. Anyone that posts on Acts or talks to me personally all know this already. Nattering Naboobs of Negativism will always be with us. Keep pressing forward