Acts20.com

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/rep-steve-king-releases-statement-debunks-new-york-times-report-and-outrageous-accusations-of-racism

Yeah, no. There's a chance King misspoke here like he said. However, given the fact that it took him a week to come up with this excuse, and given his very long history of similar types of statements, he does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

You are the problem, Dave. How do you call yourself a Christian and NOT give people the benefit of the doubt, particularly when there is nothing in their life that points to them being a racist? You scare me, sir

Here's a place you can start: www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/politics/steve-king-offensive-quotes.htmlIn these quotes you will see, again and again, a direct association between the survival of western civilization and the white purity of western civilization. It is mixing and somebody else's babies that are threatening the west. It is demographic transformation that must be avoided if our civilization is to be restored.

There was no public association with neo-Nazis, for crying out loud. I'm going to paste all of King's racist remarks for the Actscelerate community to behold.

Birds of a feather.

Yes, birds of a feather like Nyger Innis, Walter E. Williams and Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson

Before I read this part of the thread, I had already read the NYT article and was STUNNED that these things are somehow considered racist and wrong. That means that many of US, to hear others tell it, are racists! I actually wrote a response denouncing the NYT for this (and I tend to have an overall positive view of the NYT, even if I don't always like their politics).No, I'm not. I don't like stupidity no matter what color it's dressed in. I don't like hatred no matter what box it checks on race.All civilizations have beauty and wisdom, and they have all contributed in some way to the betterment of the world, I suppose. But Western Civilization, despite its darker chapters and moral failings, STILL stands head and shoulders above the rest. Yes, we are thankful that Islam preserved Aristotle's philosophy during the Dark Ages. Yes, the Far East gave us Confucius and Buddha, both of which had wisdom to offer.But the WEST, after a slow start, gave us the greatest advances in government, scholarship, philosophy, religion, science, etc. It's perfectly justifiable--even if others may debate it--to say that the West is the greatest civilization.

Sure, there's nothing wrong with that.

Sure, there's nothing wrong with that.When someone connects the survival of that civilization to making sure it stays sufficiently white, though, that's white supremacy. Right now there are howls of protests about Tibet being overrun with Chinese colonists, who are supplanting and replacing native Tibetans. Why does this principle not apply to the nations of Europe? How do Poland, France, and Germany maintain their unique cultural identities unless they drastically restrict immigration from other countries (even other European countries)? As for America, King is not afraid to point out the left's obsession with replacing white people. It is the left who is focused on a particular race of Americans. Yet, you attack the one pointing out the left's policies