Acts20.com

I have a wonderful marriage. I don’t think I could honestly ask for a better wife and mother, seriously. God sent me an intelligent, smart, beautiful, faithful very competent helper in her. (By the way, if men are so great, why did they need help from a woman anyway? LOL). It has never once occurred to me that I should be her boss. I rely on her and especially appreciate the immense amount of “common sense” God gave her. She has never tried to rule over me, nor have I ever tried to rule over her. But to hear some tell it, I’m not fulfilling my proper scriptural role unless I am basically her boss. I honestly don’t get it. I suppose it’s only evidence of my ingrained depravity that I fail to see this issue like the Calvinian or fundamentalist. It seems to me that in the culture in which the Bible was written, the women were often considered a little above the children and the slaves in the household. I for one find that having an intelligent, mature partnership with my wife to be far more interesting and mentally and emotionally and spiritually satisfying than having a wife who would basically be my slave.But, I realize I could be missing something. Perhaps there’s something to keeping the wominfolk in their proper place.

LOTS of strawmen here.My wife and I would consider ourselves complementarians, yet I would describe my marriage in the same terms in which you have described yours. The same goes for the marriages of most any complementarian I know.

Sure, you can start by showing me where I said that. I am sorry you don’t wish to explain how the “head of the wife” works in your marriage.

Sure, you can start by showing me where I said that. I am sorry you don’t wish to explain how the “head of the wife” works in your marriage. Anyone else?

I think we are using the word boss to mean bossy or belittling of one's spouse. I don't think should be the case. Consider that Jesus is the head of the Church. Is He bossy? No...but He also has the last word on things, and He will also will use His authority, as He did in Revelation to speak to the Seven Churches.The same with husbands and wives. The husband is not to be small-minded misogynist that bosses his wife around. Of course not! In my case, like you, I am blessed with an incredible wife who is highly organized, driven, faithful, hard working, etc. She handles pretty much everything that needs handling (I've got garbage duty and scary bugs duty). But there have been times I have felt I had to say no to certain directions she was taking. I guess I'm kind of like a backstop: I'm really only there for those rare occasions when some guidance is needed. And when it comes to being bossy, the reason you know I'm not is because I am still alive.Baby don't like to be backed in a corner!

Yup. I wasn't going to share this article because of the title, but now that Tom's here it seems appropriate.www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/complementarianism-for-dummies/I'll eagerly await QW completely ignoring it in favor of his incorrect preexisting interpretation of what complementarianism is and his subsequent inquiry as to what it's

I was raised in a complementarian home. My grandfather also was a strong complementarian. The men were the boss of the wife, period. I never wanted that sort of thing for myself. I obviously don’t think they were somehow more scriptural than the egalitarian model.

(Edit: This reply was in response to a now-removed portion of QW's post.)

I give a sound ruling from the bench

The ma being the head of the wife means that when he buys her new panties for general assembly he is the one who chooses the colors. You boys are a making this too hard, Imtell you what.Next case