This one was about changes being proposed to the Practical Commitments, which were apparently not all that practical after all (and plenty of ladies certainly weren't committed to it). They hosted meetings here and there. I heard good arguments from both directions, but--at least where I was (south/central Florida)--those opposed to it seemed absolutely dominant. These tours, even if they are well-intentioned (and there could be some question of that, since I think it is really an attempt to push the leadership agenda around the General Council), mean absolutely nothing. Leadership ALREADY knows that most of our bishops (or at least most of those who attend the General Council) have been against women in high leadership, etc. THEY KNOW THIS! In fact, it has been demonstrated in General Assembly after General Assembly! So exactly WHAT are they listening for? The only thing that counts is the General Council vote. If every single person in the Church of God was for the measure, but the General Council was NOT, then it does not fly.But because the General Council keeps coming back with the wrong answer, we are now having a listening tour?Further, I noted that in the comments made about one of the listening meeting, it told how there was excitement that so many people had, I suppose, positive views of the future of the Church of God. I have to take this as shorthand for If you are for what leadership is for, you are for the future of the Church of God.I especially noticed that the young ministers--the ones most likely to vote for the change--were especially noticed. I cannot help but wonder if we are being more like Rehoboam than we would think--believing that the wisdom of the young, being more to our liking, is better than the experience and wisdom of the ones that keep voting the matter down.