I can recall churches being organized with 17 members. The next step is to get a building that they can't really support or maintain. As a result, they can't pay a pastor a salary and all too often he and his wife work jobs to support their families and the church.As a result, churches have been established with no ownership, no impetus to pay a decent salary, and having churches that can hold 200 running 25. The church goes up and down with pastoral churches (often trading membership with other area churches).They get into financial trouble and are bailed out repeatedly. Common sense it would be better to take and combine 3 or 4 of these churches (but that would decrease the number of churches in the state).After this has been the norm for years, is it any wonder why churches are cannibalized to pay expenses.Our churches organize too early.We often purchase property when renting is more feasible.Your opinion