Acts20.com

On FB recently, a cousin of mine posted a meme that some university faculty member said about flatulation and rape culture.I posted this link, thewaterpipe.wordpress.com/2013/12/22/can-a-fart-be-misogynist/and I said I wasn't sure if this wasn't satire of extreme feminists at the University of Toronto. FB blocked my message and subsequent edits as SPAM. Apparently the link set it off.Now the next one is really sad. I posted this link to an article that showed evidence for a higher rate of depression among adults who had been raised by same-sex couples: www.hindawi.com/journals/drt/2016/2410392/and FB blocked that as well. It even blocked a link to an article that mentioned this other article, the federalist.I hear there is AI blocking posts on Facebook. They probably have some leftist ideologues blocking sites with social and political implications they do not like, even sites that present academic research on the welfare of children. I saw a Ted Talk on YouTube recently, which I can't seem to find now. The speaker said that FB was able to get 300K more voters out in a recent election. She said Trump won by a-hundred-and-something thousand votes. (I am not sure how she determined those numbers.) They had algorythms, she said, that could determine all kinds of things about you. They could look at your clothes and face and supposedly tell what your sexual orientation is. They can look at what you like and determine who you would vote for.So what if these ideologues at that site decide they want left-wing politicians in office, and instead of encouraging everyone to vote, they just pick the voters they want to go to the polls and vote for the pro-gay adoption politician who is concerned that loud male flatulation leads dominates women and promotes rape culture. Do you think they will stay neutral if they do not allow certain types of posts on their sites?Apparently, YT is demonitizing videos from right-wing channels. Some of them are alt-right. But they may be demonitizing less offensive sites that tend to be right wing

Here is the video about the power they have and how it could affect elections:www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFTWM7HV2UI

The older I get the more of a conspiracy theorist I become. This whole Net Neutrality is about control of what you are able to see and view. I liken it to key jingling in front of a toddler. Distract their attention while doing what you really want to do. They (the govt) would have you to believe it is about options for ISP's and keeping costs down, when in reality they can have a hand full of organizations like FB, twitter, instagram, etc. This way they can control propaganda much like North Korea. What scares me most, is that the millennial generation welcomes this with open arms. They truly believe the govt has their best interest at heart.This Linkis a long read, but goes into excruciating detail about the reach of Big Brother. [/url

The funny thing is this is exactly right, except the other way around from what you described. This is the power the telecoms will exercise over people. It's why they paid so much money to legislators to get rid of net neutrality. Even as recently as 2015 they weren't prepared to take advantage of it, but they are now, and boy howdy, they will.Follow the money. How many corporations lobbied to keep net neutrality?sunlightfoundation.com/2014/05/16/how-telecoms-and-cable-have-dominated-net-neutrality-lobbying/The telecoms have arranged for policy that will allow them to control what they let you see, and they've got you arguing in favor of it claiming that net neutrality will allow others to do exactly what they're going to do to you.Follow the money. That's all you need to know about the net neutrality debate. sunlightfoundation.com/2014/05/16/how-telecoms-and-cable-have-dominated-net-neutrality-lobbying/

They should have a law allowing ISPs to slow down content that shows naked people, and leave it at that. If they limited the porn, that would help a lot both in terms of usage on the 'net and social problems