Well said my friend, amazing what TIME and society does to denominations. Thanks for the kind words my friend, but perhaps I should balance the concerns with a look at the pit falls of being an independent church. We are in an era of generational change in leadership for independent churches, and while some, like Lakewood and the Osteens can be view as a successful transition, that may be the exception to the rule. On the other end of the scale is Cathedral at Chapel Hill and the Paulks, which are one of the best representations of the excesses of unchecked independent churches. While not all independent churches are one or the other, there are many which reached their zenith during the founding pastor's leadership and are charting downwards as the next generation leadership tries to project a sustainable vision. The aging and loss of the generation who planted the church, members and pastor, is difficult to over come. With the founding family often being the core board the local church faces a time of difficult transition.This applies to institutions as well, and yes, denominations (like the COG). However, independent churches (and ministries) do not always share the same principles of generational sustainability with a focus on developing new leadership, and viewing the regular and stable transition of leaders as a positive. As a side note, there has been some discussion as to Copeland and his ministry on the board, but I would ask question, is his ministry sustainable? There are some questions as to the outcomes of the transition in Hagin's ministry to the second generation. Somewhere in the Bible there has to be an understanding of the New Testament Church which reveals both generational sustainability and doctrinal stability.