Acts20.com

NOT responsible for topics auto-embedded from Archive.org [use a proxy] Absolutely NO unmasking!

Two men claim it was they who assaulted Ford (L)

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Author Message
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic: Two men claim it was they who assaulted Ford (L)
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
nypost.com/2018/09/27/two-men-tell-senate-that-they-not-kavanaugh-assaulted-ford/Not that it will matter to the left-wing Marxist revolutionaries


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Absent any corroboration, this should be treated with exactly the same skepticism as Ford's claims. The Senate Judiciary Committee has interviewed them both and has received a sworn statement from one, and reported that geography and timeline align and that they both seem to be of sound mind. But the same three things could be said about Ford and her claims. It is also not unheard of for people to falsely confess to famous things. The way to defeat claims with no evidence is not to overwhelm them with more claims without evidence. Don't get in the weeds. As of now the discussion should stay focused on the lack of corroboration for any of the claims made against Kavanaugh.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Your wisdom is sound. The only difference I might see is that these parties are CLAIMING guilt personally, which is unusual if one is actually innocent


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Dave Dorsey:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
To advance their agenda ...


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Mat:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Granted, although the same type of argument is used by people who are saying think about everything Ford and Ramirez and Swetnick have to lose by making these accusations. It's not an invalid argument in either case, it's just not actual evidence. That said -- I do personally agree that it is less likely one would falsely claim guilt then that one would choose to embroil themselves in a fiasco like this with a false allegation. To advance their agenda - referring to the women's claims - lying is wholly acceptable - Lenin would say it makes them heroes of the state. American culture is at war, albeit its a one sided affair. As it has been said, all's fair in love and war. I am struggling with the contradictory assertions that women are equal to men, but that men must protect women. I know, my thoughts do not matter because I an an old white conservative male. I'm going to keep this in mind in my future interaction with women. Mat


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Two men have admitted to assaulting her. She


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
If a 75 year old Afro-American grandmother becomes the nominee, it will not matter. Anyone who gets the nomination will be attacked like this


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Resident Skeptic:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 41938
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
My impression is that Ford was a mentally troubled person long before this alleged assault, and still is, along with being a leftist


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Return to “Acts 2.0”
Jump to: